Run out for 199, and some other near-misses

Younis Khan was run out for 199 in the Test against India

Steven Lynch16-Jan-2006The regular Monday column in which Steven Lynch answers your questions about (almost) any aspect of cricket:


Younis Khan was run out for 199 at Lahore
© AFP

Younis Khan was run out for 199 in the Test against India at Lahore – is this unique? asked Gulfraz Ali from Delhi
Younis Khan was the seventh person to be out for 199 in a Test match, but he was the first one to be run out. An unlucky thirteen people have been run out for 99 in Tests (for a full list of 99s – and 199s – click here). During the 2005 English domestic season, Jason Gallian of Nottinghamshire was run out for 199 twice, an unwanted feat that is unique in first-class cricket.I recently heard that Michael Slater made nine 99s in Tests. This seems like a lot – is it a record? asked Mark Berger from Australia
Fortunately for Michael Slater, he didn’t make nine 99s in Tests – but he was out nine times in the nineties (i.e. between 90 and 99), which is indeed a record. Steve Waugh, Slater’s sometime team-mate and captain, recorded ten scores in the nineties, but two of those were not outs. As this list shows, among current players Rahul Dravid has had eight Test scores in the nineties and Inzamam-ul-Haq seven, both with one not-out.Is Jeetan Patel, New Zealand’s new offspinner, related to Dipak Patel, who played for them in the 1980s? asked Bob Andrews from Stourbridge
Jeetan Patel, who was born in Wellington in 1980, made his debut for New Zealand last August, and has so far played four one-day internationals for them. As far as I know he is not related to Dipak Patel, who was born in Kenya, was talked of as an England prospect when he played for Worcestershire, and later moved to Auckland. He played 37 Tests and 75 ODIs for New Zealand, with a highest score of 99 at Christchurch in 1991-91 – when he was run out by England’s Derek Pringle, who was also born in Kenya.


Richard Hadlee denied himself the opportunity to take ten wickets in an innings
© Getty Images

I remember Kapil Dev taking nine wickets in a Test innings, how many people have missed out on the “Perfect Ten” by just one wicket? asked Mukul Naik from Bangalore
There have been 15 instances of a bowler taking nine wickets in a Test innings: Muttiah Muralitharan is the only man to have done it twice. Jim Laker, who took 9 for 37 for England against Australia at Old Trafford in 1956, went one better in the second innings and took all 10 for 53. The only other bowler to capture all ten wickets in a Test innings is Anil Kumble, for India against Pakistan at Delhi in 1998-99. The unluckiest of the nine-for men was arguably Richard Hadlee, against Australia at Brisbane in 1985-86: he took the first eight wickets to fall, then caught the ninth one off the bowling off Vaughan Brown (it was his only Test wicket). For a full list of bowlers taking nine or ten wickets in an innings, click here.Who was the bowler who dismissed Don Bradman for 0 in his final Test innings? asked Terry Beale from Aberdeen
The man who brought The Don`s Test career to an end a boundary short of an average of 100 was the legspinner Eric Hollies. It was Bradman’s second ball at The Oval in 1948, and Hollies was bowling over the wicket (not round it, as some newsreel films suggest). Bradman groped a little for a googly and was bowled – he later denied that he had “tears in his eyes at the thought that this was his last Test match. Hollies had a long career – he played for Warwickshire from 1932 to 1957, and still heads their wicket-taking lists with 2201 at 20.45. He first played for England in 1934-35, and took 44 wickets in 13 Tests in all. He died in 1981, aged 68.Has anyone been stranded on 99 in a one-day international when the overs ran out? asked Johnny Boxall from Adelaide
This annoying fate has befallen four batsmen. The first was Bruce Edgar of New Zealand, who was one short of his hundred against India at Auckland in 1980-81 when the overs ran out. At Adelaide in 1984-85 it happened to Dean Jones, for Australia against Sri Lanka (Allan Border did reach three figures, though). Andy Flower was stranded on 99 for Zimbabwe against Australia at Harare in 1999-2000, and so was Ramnaresh Sarwan for West Indies against India at Ahmedabad in 2002-03. In slightly different circumstances, Richie Richardson of West Indies had reached 99 not out when the winning run was scored in a match against Pakistan at Sharjah in 1985-86. A similar bitter-sweet fate awaited Alistair Campbell, for Zimbabwe against New Zealand at Bulawayo in 2000-01. For a full list of batsmen scoring 99 in an ODI, click here.

No first-day dismissals

It was also the first time India hadn’t lost a wicket on the first day – on a complete day’s play – of a Test

S Rajesh26-May-2007

India have now put together 73 century stands for the third wicket in Tests, and Dravid has been involved in the last 24. © Getty Images
India had four batsmen coming out to bat on the opening day of the second Test against Bangladesh, but none of them were dismissed, making it a rare instance of no wickets being lost in an entire day’s play. India’s score of 326 is the highest score among the instances when no wicket has been lost on the first day of a Test, going past Australia’s 301 at Trent Bridge against England in 1989. It was also the first time India hadn’t lost a wicket on the first day – on a complete day’s play – of a Test. Rahul Dravid has been involved in the last three instances when India have scored more than 250 runs in a day without losing a wicket – at Lahore in 2005-06, he added 258 on the fourth day with Virender Sehwag on the way to that 410-run opening stand, while in 2001-02 he combined with VVS Laxman on an utterly compelling fourth day at Kolkata, adding 335. In terms of the number of runs scored on a day in which no wickets have fallen, India’s effort lies in fifth place. The highest is 357, which has been achieved twice – by Sri Lanka against South Africa in Colombo last year, and by West Indies against Pakistan at Kingston in 1958. In third place is West Indies’ 340-run effort against Australia, at Kingston again, in 1999, while the Laxman-Dravid stand at Kolkata is fourth. India have now put together 73 century stands for the second wicket in Tests, and Dravid has been involved in the last 24. Wasim Jaffer has scored less than 15 in 19 of his 35 Test innings. On the 16 occasions that he has gone past 15, he has gone on to at least a half-century 10 times. (Click here for Jaffer’s inning-by-innings list in Tests.) With both openers retiring ill, this was also the first instance in Test cricket of four batsmen combining to add more than 300 runs for the first wicket.

An unlikely Essex boy

Jenny Thompson speaks to Adam Hollioake on the eve of his return to big-time cricket

Jenny Thompson21-Jun-2007


Adam Hollioake is hoping for more Twenty20 success – but this time with Essex
© Garry Bowden

In cricket’s worst-kept secret since Michael Vaughan resigned as England one-day captain earlier this week, Adam Hollioake has signed up to make his Twenty20 return. It’s four years since he captained Surrey to success in the inaugural tournament, but he won’t be turning out for them this time: he will be playing for Essex.”I wanted to play for Surrey,” he admits. But despite excelling for them in 2003 and ’04, times have moved on. Surrey’s focus is understandably on their younger players – Hollioake is now 35 – and so he had to settle on Essex instead. Then again, it was their coach’s idea that he should return to the game.Graham Gooch spotted that he still had the talent earlier this year while they were playing beach cricket in Australia – where Hollioake was born and is now settled, with a slight Aussie twang to boot – and suggested he make a comeback. Business commitments Down Under prevented Hollioake from considering a full-time role but a month out for Twenty20, and a charity event, was plausible.While Surrey are experts in this short game, Essex have made the finals day only once in four seasons – and they snapped him up. It must be hard to parachute straight into a side, almost as an overseas player must feel. I ask if he feels like an Essex player yet. He pauses. “I met the guys for the first time on Monday. I think once I start playing I will be more part of it.”Netting has gone well. “I started off scratchy last week. But I had good net on Monday. It’s all coming good at the last minute!” Indeed, he signed just three days before his first match in Essex colours, against Sussex, this Friday.He’s super-fit at least, a self-confessed fanatic, fitter even than in his playing days. “Cricket prevents you from getting fit – you spend so much time on the pitch.” This includes training for his recent boxing match in London with the former All Black Eric Rush. Hollioake has boxed since his youth and enjoyed the experience hugely, even though he lost on points.”It was a tough fight,” he says. “It was exactly what I expected. It was hard, a hard game. It didn’t hold any surprises. I love fighting. I’m a bit of a sicko!” [laughs] “Anything… as long as it’s legal.”


Hollioake is keen for more silverware
© Getty Images

Would he do it again? “I’d do anything for charity.” Yes, he would. This fight was for a children’s charity, Sparks. Earlier this year he did the marathon for the CHASE Ben Hollioake Fund, set up in memory of his brother who died in 2002. Over the last few years he’s done treks, bike rides and sailing events for good causes. He even played ice cricket.Ben’s death has inevitably made him a more sober character, and charity commitments are an example, but his sparkling, cheeky spirit remains. He giggles naughtily, for example, when I ask if playing for Essex is his biggest act of charity yet.The marathon went well. While most were sweltering on a surprisingly warm April day, it wasn’t so hot for Hollioake, used to the Perth heat. “I was one of the only ones running in the sun and I had a free course. My cricket bat began to get heavy towards the end!”Despite being weighed down by full kit, he completed it in six hours. Then again, he is fiercely competitive. This streak came out in beach cricket. “We’re sportsmen. None like losing – even with a game of cards.” Gooch wants to sign him up for another stint next year, and he has provisionally agreed. “I love it. It’s great fun.”With all these commitments, it’s amazing he does find the time to fit in his property development business, set up in 1998. “Originally it was me, dad and Ben… It’s moved on a lot.” It’s now a full-time occupation and the main reason he won’t consider a full comeback.Time may judge Hollioake as an excellent one-day and Twenty20 player, but it’s worth considering his first-class stats, too. Although he played just four Tests, his first-class average is 38.7, higher than Vaughan, Flintoff or Trescothick. His innovative Brearley-esque thinking helped Surrey to three Championship titles, while there’s a touch of Imran Khan to the way he melded disparate individuals.Surrey haven’t been anything like the first-class side they were since he left. Still, he has no regrets. There’s plenty away from cricket to occupy him, including school runs for his five-year-old daughter Bennaya.It’s the holidays, now, though, which make the Twenty20 campaign convenient. So, how will he feel when he has to face his old teammates when Essex play Surrey at the end of the month? “I’ve not had time to think about it. I’m just worrying about myself to be honest.”He has actually played one Twenty20 since retiring, a one-off charity match for the Tsunami Fund at The Oval, and he took a hat-trick.If he can slip so easily back into the groove this time around, what would he think if England came knocking for the World Twenty20 Championship this September? “I hadn’t considered that.” Then, a pause… And a glimmer. “If that came up I’d have to think about it!”

The Dentist from Nevis

Maynard typified an era when a tour of the West Indies was the ultimate
examination of body and soul

Andrew Miller25-Mar-2007To an English cricket fan of the early 1990s, John “The Dentist”
Maynard was one of the most evocative characters imaginable. One might
even go so far as to suggest he is the most famous West Indian fast
bowler never to have played a Test. Those who were not hooked on the
coverage of England’s tour of the Caribbean in 1993-94 will probably
have no idea who he is. Others, like myself, could give chapter and
verse on his marmalisation of England’s middle-order during their
build-up to that winter’s Test series.Maynard, to this distant long-wave listener of Test Match Special,
typified an era when a tour of the West Indies was the ultimate
examination of body and soul. The arrival of a Test team in the
Caribbean, particularly if it had come from England, was a call to
arms for every aspiring cricketer in the region. Long before Duncan
Fletcher turned tour games into a 12-man-a-side glorified net session,
Maynard and his cronies were cranking up the pace and injecting the
venom, eager to advance their claims to Test selection, but equally
determined to crush the tourists’ morale before they embarked on the
main event.The Dentist’s first-class career was brief. He played 13 times for the
Leeward Islands between 1991-92 and 1998-99, taking 35 wickets with a
best of 5 for 24. But in that time he was undoubtedly explosive. “In
the early 1990s, people were ranking my pace with Bish [Ian Bishop],”
he told Cricinfo at Warner Park, where – as a proud Nevisian – he was
dividing between net-bowling duties for the visiting World Cup teams,
and a stint as a guest summariser on none other than TMS. “I think
even now, at the age of 37, I’m in the mid-eighties.””I was always pretty close,” he says of his lack of Test recognition.
“I used to be quite pacy, and I was touted to be the one who’d slip in
maybe when the Bishop era finished. But then they were forever
changing – Ottis Gibson, Vasbert Drakes, Nixon McLean. Sometimes the
luck of the draw doesn’t fall on your side. But I was always close
enough to the pot for them to be having a look.”Maynard was never closer than in the spring of 1994, when England came
to visit. He played in only two of the tour matches, and one of those
– for St Kitts and Nevis on the pre-development Basseterre ground –
wasn’t deemed to be first-class. Nevertheless, in the space of 52
hounding overs, he picked off England’s finest for fun. The scores of
his victims were: Atherton 6, Maynard 2, Hussain 0, Stewart 21, Thorpe
11, Hick 0, Ramprakash 4. Seven England top-order batsmen, blasted
away for a sum total of 44 runs. Job done. Over to you Curtly.Like any self-respecting West Indian fast bowler, there’s one name in
that list of victims that stands out from the rest. “Graeme Hick, he’s
always been one of my favourites, funnily enough,” glints the Dentist,
recalling how, having undermined Hick’s Test preparations with a duck,
he stalked the poor man all the way back to the county scene the
following summer, dismissing him third ball for 6 in a one-off Benson &Hedges Cup
appearance for Norfolk against Worcestershire.

“I was by far and away the most destructive quick bowler in the

“I think at that time Hick was established as a first-class cricketer,
but as a Test cricketer he never really got a chance to settle down as
he might have liked. He lacked a bit of confidence, and maybe that’s
because he wasn’t from England. Maybe he thought he was supposed to do
a little more than he’s supposed to. Maybe that stalled his career.”Surprising as it may seem, Maynard would sympathise if that was the
case. As an inhabitant of Nevis, an island of just 11,000 people,
recognition has always seemed harder to come by than it might have
been had he hailed from Barbados, Jamaica or Trinidad. “It’s always
been a problem with the island politics,” he says. “Take Stuart
Williams [a fellow Nevisian who played 31 Tests between 1994 and
2002], his name was always about for getting dropped, even though the
guys competing with him didn’t get the same runs. Smaller islands tend
to get the hard knocks sometimes.”But they also have, just once in a while, the opportunity to punch
above their weight in spectacular fashion. Only last year, Maynard and
Williams joined forces in what he now describes as his favourite form
of the game – Twenty20 cricket – to help propel little Nevis all the
way to the semi-finals of a tournament that featured teams from 19
different islands. Along the way, they inflicted massively satisfying
defeats on their nearest neighbours and bitterest rivals, St Kitts in
the first round and Antigua in the quarter-finals.”I was by far and away the most destructive quick bowler in the
competition,” says the Dentist, “even at the age of 37. I took the
most wickets as a quick and consistently generated the most pace.” His
finest hour was a haul of 4 for 9 against St Kitts that earned him a
Man of the Match cheque for $25,000, and inter-island bragging rights
for evermore. “We’re the smaller population in Nevis, but we focus a
lot more on cricket, In St Kitts they are all focussed on football.”That’s because Nevis has a cricket heritage that St Kitts, its swanky
new stadium notwithstanding, would die for. The Nevisian, Elquemedo
Willett, who played five Tests as a left-arm spinner between 1973 and
1975, was the first cricketer from any of the smaller islands to play
for West Indies. Six have since followed his example: Derek Parry,
Keith Arthurton, Stuart Williams, Runako Morton and Carl Tuckett. St
Kitts, by contrast, has yet to get off the mark. “The majority of our
young guys try to emulate Willett,” adds Maynard. “He was the stepping
stone.”Nevis is way ahead of Kitts when it comes to producing international cricketers – Elquemedo Willet, Runako Morton(above), Keith Arthurton, Stuart Williams, Carl Tuckett and Derek Parry. Kitts is yet to produce one•Getty ImagesMaynard still has the look and build of a genuine fast bowler, and the
self-belief to match. “About three years ago, I was playing locally
for the islands competition, and I might have got a chance [for the
Test side] then. Everything seemed to be right, I was feeling so good
with my game, my fitness, everything. And I was getting wickets. But
that’s the time that [Ian] Bradshaw got into the team. If I’d got a
look in with the Leewards then, who knows, maybe I would have been in
Jamaica by now.”Why though, is he known as the Dentist? “It’s a funny old story,” he
grins. “I was playing for Nevis against Antigua many years ago, and
there was this bloke playing for Antigua called Zorah Barthley, who
was the West Indies youth team captain. Nevis had never beaten Antigua
outright in Antigua, but that afternoon, we took the new ball and he
was playing really late. And I thought to myself, if he’s playing late
now I’ve got to rough him up early in the morning.”First thing in the morning he nicks one but the umps didn’t send him
on his way, and that wound me up a bit. And so the next ball was four
yards quicker than anything I’ve ever bowled. He shaped to hook, and
his teeth went flying all over the place, and it was a funny old
sight. But he was the man who made the Dentist really. I couldn’t have
done it without him.”I never worry about hurting them at the time,” he adds. “Maybe I’ll
think about it later at night, but in the heat of the moment, as a
bowler if you can’t get them out, you’ve gotta hurt them ’til they get
out. I think I’ve broken pretty much every part of the body so far,
from the teeth to the jaw to the nose to the ribs to the arms and to
the toes.” No wonder his legend precedes him.

England favourites to wrap up the series

A stats preview of the third Test between England and Pakistan at Headingley

George Binoy03-Aug-2006

Matthew Hoggard is four short of taking 500 first-class wickets © Getty Images
Pakistan are hoping to have Mohammad Asif and Shoaib Akhtar back for the fourth Test at The Oval but they have a real fight on their hands to ensure that the series stays alive after the third at Headingley. In eight Tests, England have beaten Pakistan four times at Leeds, while Pakistan have won just once. The most recent match in 1996 ended in a draw. Since 2000, England have won three times and lost twice – against India and South Africa – at Headingley. Since 1990, the team that has won the tosshas batted on eight occasions but won only four of those games. Of the five Tests in which a team has chosen to field, they’ve won three, and drawn and lost one each.74% of the matches (48 out of 65) at Leeds have ended in a decisive result. The stat has risen to 84% since 1990 with 11 out of 13 Tests having a result.After being ravaged by injuries, England have eight players in their 12-man squad who have never played a Test at Leeds before. Only Marcus Trescothick, Andrew Strauss, Matthew Hoggard and Steve Harmison have played at Headingley. Since Pakistan didn’t play at Leeds during their 2001 tour, Inzamam-ul-Haq is the only player to have played at this venue.However, Inzamam hasn’t had the happiest time at Leeds where he averages 22.75 in four innings and has passed 20 only once.Headingley hasn’t been Hoggard’s favourite ground either. He averages 38.57 and has a strike-rate of 66.8 after taking seven wickets in two Tests. However, he is just four wickets short of taking 500 first-class wickets.Pakistan’s opening partnerships in two Tests so far have been 28, 0, 4 and 21. The prospects for improvement don’t look too good because Leeds has an average opening partnership of 29.15 since 1990 – the lowest average for any venue in England which has hosted more than two Tests.

'Blind men in white coats'

Day one of the New Year Test was marred by poor umpiring decisions, with India getting the worst of it. A selection of what the pundits and the papers had to say

03-Jan-2008


Ganguly appeals in vain for a leg-side catch off Ricky Ponting
© Getty Images

“Blind men in white coats do India in”
Times of India“Umpires and traditionalists resist the onset of technology to resolve tricky decisions. Nothing in yesterday’s events advanced their cause… Batsmen and fielding teams ought to be allowed three references an innings, the strategy adopted in tennis. It is high time the lords and masters of the game adopted this policy.
“They claim technological assistance takes too long. But even if is slow, we still must use it. Otherwise, all of a sudden the game’s taken away from a side, as it happened in the case of India on Wednesday.”
“I don’t think the game needs to go where every decision gets referred, There are ways you can improve it, but let’s not push and poke and prod it too much.”
“Today, we had a decision referred to the third umpire, and you still got the wrong decision made.”
“It’s time for Steve Bucknor to retire. He has been a good umpire, but he is past his sell-by date. He is human. ICC must do something about it.”
“The world’s No.1 umpire for the past three years is Simon Taufel from Sydney and he should be out in the middle making the crucial decisions under pressure for this is what the best aspire to.I believe the argument for neutral umpires was valid years ago when there was a degree of acceptance for mediocrity due to a lack of television cameras and part-time officials, while the scourge of match-fixing was also lurking beneath the surface.”
Steve Waugh makes a radical suggestion

Baartman makes his case to move ahead in SA's bowling queue

As South Africa balance workload and World Cup planning, Ottneil Baartman’s spell in New Chandigarh stood out in a tour where bench strength has been thrust to the forefront

Firdose Moonda13-Dec-2025Discussing South Africa’s T20 World Cup bowling options in the time of Kagiso Rabada’s absence seems futile because much will depend on him and his availability. But it’s a conversation that must be had if only to prepare for a worst-case scenario. South Africa have been without Rabada for the entire India tour as he recovers from a rib injury but have coped better than expected. Marco Jansen has dazzled in both aggression and wicket-taking terms while Lungi Ngidi has led the T20I attack with skill, but these are players we would expect to see step up.What about the bench strength? Nandre Burger made a promising start to the ODI series before he hurt his hamstring, and now Ottneil Baartman has come in from the cold with a solid performance in the series-levelling second T20I in New Chandigarh. Baartman took 4 for 24 and served a reminder of what he can offer after last taking a four-for at the 2024 T20 World Cup against Netherlands.There, Baartman was South Africa’s new kid on the block, picked for the national side after leading the bowling charts for most of the SA20 before he was overtaken by his team-mate Jansen in the final, and with just one international to his name when the World Cup began. His control, ability to move the ball off the seam and to execute both a pinpoint yorker and a good bouncer made him a perfect pick for the drop-in pitch in Nassau County, where he had most of his success. But he was benched by the time South Africa got to the business end. Since then, his appearances have been limited both because of South Africa’s problem of plenty and a knee injury.Related

Quinton de Kock's 90 powers SA to massive win

Classy de Kock shows shades of old at just the right time

Suryakumar's lack of runs a worry in lead-up to T20 World Cup

Post the 2024 T20 World Cup, Baartman has only played in nine of South Africa’s 29 T20Is and has not had the opportunity to make much of a case for himself under Shukri Conrad. Until New Chandigarh.Picked in the XI to try and level the series against an India side that left South Africa in pieces after game one, Baartman was given the ball in the eighth over when significant damage had already been done. India were 65 for 3 chasing 214, but had Axar Patel and Tilak Verma at the crease, with Hardik Pandya, Jitesh Sharma and Shivam Dube to come. It took Baartman three balls to make an impact. He delivered it full and angling away from the left-handed Axar, who tried to smash it over the covers but mishit to the fielder, Reeza Hendricks. While the dismissal will be remembered for Hendricks taking a good low catch, it was also Baartman’s line, length and seam movement that created the breakthrough.His first spell lasted just one over and he was then brought back for the 12th, with India 89 for 4 and barely hanging on. With a required run-rate of 13.88, Baartman conceded only five runs in his second over, varying his lengths from short to the yorker and maintaining a stump-to-stump line.Then, he was brought back for the death, which is the role he thrived in in his breakout SA20 and should have had a wicket with the second ball of his over. Jitesh tried to hit a 136kph length delivery over midwicket and was early through the stroke. The ball clipped the bail and caused it to spin but did not dislodge it. To make matters worse for Baartman, Jitesh hit the next ball for six.In the 19th over, with Jitesh dismissed, Baartman was at his best when he cleaned up the tail. He bowled Dube with a seam-up delivery that was over 140kph and skidded past him to send the stumps flying, had Arshdeep Singh caught off a short ball at backward point, and then had Varun Chakravarthy caught at long-on trying to go big. That over consisted of four runs and three wickets, and though South Africa had all but won the game before it, it ensured the result was emphatic. Baartman had demonstrated the full range of what he could do.Ottneil Baartman has played six ODIs and 15 T20Is so far•Getty ImagesBeing a man of few words, Baartman explained in a post-match TV interview that his role was informed by what had happened earlier on, when “the swing bowlers [Ngidi primarily, and Jansen and Lutho Sipamla to a lesser extent] did their thing and then we just tried to use the wobble and cross seam and went shorter rather than fuller.”Just under half of Baartman’s deliveries (11 out of 24) were back of a length or shorter and it was the decisions he made when choosing which ball to deliver. Whether it earns him a spot in the next match is yet to be seen as South Africa continue to rotate their squad in this series, as hinted at by captain Aiden Markram. “It’s never easy. As a player, you just want to get given three of four games to build some momentum but it’s also just about how busy our schedule is with the World Cup, SA20 and this series,” Markram said. “Hopefully by the time the SA20 is done, everyone has some good game time.”That’s instructional because it was also the SA20 that helped then-coach Rob Walter decide on his squad for the 2024 T20 World Cup. Though South Africa have more international fixtures this time around than last – they played no T20Is between December and May before the June tournament but will play eight across this series and the home matches against West Indies – the domestic franchise competition holds huge sway.No one will be more pleased to hear that than Baartman, who will play for Paarl Royals in season four after spending three summers with Sunrisers Eastern Cape. He has been among the top-ten wicket-takers in all three editions of the SA20 and another strong performance could see him play a second successive T20 World Cup.

Mercurial Pakistan continue to confound

Some strife, considerable friction within the side, a run of bad results and a boggling glut of off-field controversies seems to be what spurs Pakistan on

Osman Samiuddin in Karachi02-Jul-2008

Younis Khan has been at the heart of Pakistan’s last three big wins over
India and twice he has organised chases over 300
© AFP

What is it that makes the Pakistani cricketer tick? In this sport, it is
among the most compelling questions, unanswered till now and probably
never to be fully resolved. If you didn’t know any better you’d think,
from various results over the years, some strife, considerable friction
within the side, a run of bad results and a boggling glut of off-field
controversies spurs them on.Pakistan had no business winning today and that too chasing 300-plus;
perhaps this is precisely why they won. They have been poor in this
tournament thus far, their bowling without sting, their batting uncertain.
The future of at least one from captain and coach has been on the line.The latter has been intent on making matters worse for himself. The former
pulled out at the last minute, in typically tragi-comic circumstances
after a rare public announcement yesterday had confirmed his place in the
playing XI; not that he has been particularly inspirational. But it was in
the air yesterday at Pakistan’s practice, this vague feeling that
something might happen, even with this depleted side. Nobody could really
articulate it, but it hung in the air.It is a well-worn cliché, but Imran Khan was on to something when he spoke
of cornered tigers. This is not quite the same stage but Pakistan’s
position in the tournament is as perilous. Their progress is still in
other hands: if India wins against Sri Lanka tomorrow, Pakistan are out. However, if India loses, Pakistan will go through to the final if they beat Bangladesh.One thing that makes sense is that Younis Khan was at the centre of this
win, for he well represents Pakistan’s mood swings. He is a difficult man
to decipher: brave, committed, but also impulsive and tempestuous, his
next move as difficult to predict as his last. One day he is magnificent,
the next as frustrating. One day he wants the captaincy, the next he
doesn’t. But when he clicks Pakistan does too, as Misbah-ul-Haq pointed
out later. He has been at the heart of Pakistan’s last three big wins over
India and twice he has organised chases over 300.Significantly, a fresh debate will also begin now on Misbah’s role. As
disenchantment grows with Shoaib Malik’s leadership, eyes move to the
deputy and an emphatic triumph over India in trying circumstances is a
sure way to speed up and heat up the debate. It is unwise to judge
Misbah’s leadership on one match alone, though understandably he was
elated. “I enjoyed it a lot. The pressure is always there as a
professional cricketer and you just have to face these difficulties.”And it was no surprise that the first question asked of him later,
mischievously, was what the future held for the man he replaced. “Malik
has performed well in this tournament and his place remains,” Misbah
straight-batted back, albeit after everyone had their laugh. “He will keep
playing where he has played.”Though careful to say what was needed about Malik, Misbah said that he had
tried to change mood as well as tactics. “I just focused on certain
things. We were looking a little negative and I told the players to just
be positive. We played with a different strategy. We have kept wickets in
hand in previous matches and tried to up the tempo later, but this time we
changed that. We had two stroke-playing openers and I just told them to
play their own game.”More important than even what Misbah did as captain is what he did as
batsman. Tonight he did what he is meant to do, what he has been so close
to doing so many times before. He finished a match, even hitting the
winning runs. “It gave me great pleasure to do that,” he said. “Sometimes
you get close but it doesn’t happen, but when you don’t do it, you
shouldn’t take pressure from it. You just try and finish the next one.
Today was very good in that sense.”Today very good, tomorrow it might not matter. Beyond the
morrow, some will begin to argue however, this result assumes greater
importance. But beyond even that, where the query as to what motivates
Pakistan on such days resides? That riddle we are no nearer to
unravelling.

Nothing new has emerged

Watching the second Test wend its way towards a draw, it occurred to Vaneisa Baksh that the most exciting cricket really comes from evenly matched teams

Vaneisa Baksh03-Jun-2008
Ramnaresh Sarwan may have scored a century on the final day, but by then the match had a tired air © Getty Images
Watching the second Test wend its way towards a draw, it occurred to me that the most exciting cricket really comes from evenly-matched teams, even if they are not strong ones. The cricket is at its most competitive, twisting us into the knots we need to be in to keep watching for five days.By the final day in Antigua, with Australia having declared twice, and West Indies never really sparkling, it had become onerous. Even when the captain Ramnaresh Sarwan made his 11th Test century it had a tired air, as if we had waited too long for him to convert another fifty to a hundred. Ian Bishop mentioned that Sarwan had experienced a good season on account of his three fifties and a century in the Sri Lanka series. That is true, but Sarwan has been playing for eight years, and is an exceptionally good batsman who should have been able to turn more of his 30 half-centuries into hundreds. As it was, he lasted until 128 – a necessary innings if only for pride and to keep the series alive with a draw – and alongside him was the rock, Shivnarine Chanderpaul.Chanderpaul made another century in the first innings, and when the match ended with Ricky Ponting deciding it was not worth his while to plod on, he was 77 not out, having partnered Sarwan to guide West Indies to their first draw with Australia since 1995, and earning the Man-of-the-Match award. “Play it safe,” he said, just try to last it out – an ethic that seems terribly at odds with the flamboyance associated with West Indies cricketers.He held ground the way only Chanderpaul can in these times. In the first innings, his heroics had been simply another day’s work to him, that stoic, workman’s approach to the game that has empowered him above all in this team given to view their wickets as castaways. In truth, it was every man playing according to his nature during the series thus far. Nothing really new has emerged.In the first Test, the bowlers did what had been longed for and reaped wickets, and by doing so went into the second match with a larger measure of hope. Yet the batting was indifferent, and cost a game that should have been the reward for four good days. This has been the nature of the West Indies team; when the bowling and/or fielding is true, the batting tells lies, and vice versa. Rarely do all the elements join the chorus, and this is not just reflective of the squad members.At the barely scuffed grounds of the Sir Vivian Richards stadium in Antigua, what greeted them? They found a pitch that the journalist Garth Wattley described as “a lifeless, brown stretch of earth,” adding vividly that “there was more discernible movement in molasses than off it [on the first day]”.To compete on this corpse, there were no recognised spinners, and five pacers with little difference among them. In a grand sweep, the selectors managed to deflate the momentum gained by the quicks in the previous match because they were asking them to ply their trade on a surface that absorbed their wiles without giving anything back. They also managed to suppress further what little hope there might be for spinners having a chance on the West Indies team, as they again communicated their vision that spin is part-time work for some batsmen.One imagines pitch preparation aligned to the strengths of the home team, and one imagines selections based on maximising conditions that exist – desirable or not. Home advantage did not seem to be a worthy consideration for the administrators.The result was a first day’s play that was excruciatingly lifeless, as if the pitch had sucked away all the energy in its precincts. Spectators could not be bothered to come. There was no West Indian energy to come from off the field, as it did at Sabina Park. Even the fielders couldn’t keep their focus, and under the circumstances, the fumbles were costly and painful to the hard-working bowlers.To make matters worse, the drainage on the outfield was bad enough to lose two sessions on the third day, causing much lamentation over the enormous cost incurred to try to fix this problem repeatedly after it had become evident at the World Cup last year. It was embarrassing, and one wonders whether this had been factored into the decision to hold one of the matches on the ground. Poor umpiring decisions contributed to reducing the scores, a continuing source of debate over technology use.For Ricky Ponting’s men, it would be gratifying to hold on to the Sir Frank Worrell trophy even before they set foot on Barbados soil for the final match. The retirement of Stuart MacGill leaves Australia with yet another hole to fill, but they are a resilient bunch, with a cricket ethic that leaves them formidable even under pressure. The third Test may yet be the most revealing of what might be a turning point for both sides. If only the series was longer.

Gayle's forces confound England

Andrew McGlashan presents West Indies’ marks out of ten for their series against England

Andrew McGlashan11-Mar-2009After five years of fruitless contests at home and away, West Indies finally recorded their first series win since they defeated Bangladesh on home soil in 2004. Cricinfo runs its eye over the stars and spares Captain Cool: Chris Gayle knows his own mind, and the team know to follow him•Getty Images9Chris Gayle
Not since Viv Richards has a West Indies captain united the team with such success. Gayle’s laid-back, chilled-out air hasn’t changed, but there is a more responsible style about his game these days. That was clear during his two centuries, especially his 104 in Kingston which was shorn of much of the normal Gayle dash and flair. In the field he isn’t the most proactive of captains and is rarely seen pushing the game hard, particularly when the opposition are on top, but he deserves credit for sticking to his guns. His attitude towards the final Test was negative and sngle-minded, but ultimately justified – if only just.Ramnaresh Sarwan
Found the form of his life and showed the sort of batsmanship everyone has expected from him since his debut aged 19. In his first five innings of the series his lowest score was 94 and he compiled an outstanding career-best 291 in Barbados to grind England into the dirt. He has taken on a new level of responsibility in recent months, perversely since standing down as vice-captain. He remains a figurehead in the team and someone the batting order can build around in the coming years. His two failures in Trinidad showed he was human after all, but this will go down as a defining series.8Shivnarine Chanderpaul
Still a limpet at the crease, but the difference in this series wasthat he had plenty of support so a relatively quiet start didn’tmatter. Was the victim of the most horrendous referral decision inBarbados, when nothing looked like shifting him, before more thanmaking up for it with a crucial 147 not out in Trinidad, which went a long way towards securing the series. That England’s chances of a late victoryrose so much when he was trapped for 6 on the final day showed that heis still the sought-after wicket, but finally there is somecompetition emerging for that tag.Brendan Nash
One of the key figures in West Indies’ resurgence, Nash has taken someof pressure off Chanderpaul in holding the middle order together. HisAustralian grit and determination hasn’t gone amiss in the side andthe century he scored in Trinidad was reward for all the years of hardwork he has put into making himself the best he can be. There isnothing flashy about his play, but it is just what West Indies need tobecome consistently competitive. His bowling is better than your average medium-pacer, but some way short of fourth-seamer material.Denesh Ramdin
Statistically the 166 in Barbados was his key performance of theseries, but in every other way it was his 87-ball 17 in the finalinnings that stood out. Without his calmness West Indies would havewatched the main prize slip away, but he withstood those agonisinglytense final two hours. His century was a breakthrough knock after abarren run with the bat, his keeping was safe and tidy, and thevice-captaincy has brought a mature side to his play that hasn’tpreviously been noticeable. He is one of the major success stories ofthe Dyson-Gayle era.Fidel Edwards
Nine wickets at 54 suggest a pretty ordinary series, but Edwards was the most consistently hostile bowler on either side and the only man to extract regular life out of even the flattest pitches. However, arguably it was with the bat that he proved most vital. In Antigua and Trinidad he survived the closing overs in thrilling draws, the latter securing the series for West Indies. With better catching he would have had more wickets, but a huge plus was that he stayed fit throughout.7Jerome Taylor
He produced the spell that decided the series, but very little thereafter. His 5 for 11 at Sabina Park was thrilling to watch and gave West Indies cricket the boost it desperately needed. Combining pace, late swing and control he proved too much for England’s top order and his deliveries to Kevin Pietersen and Matt Prior were among the best you’ll see. After such a high he struggled to hit the same heights again, although like all the bowlers he suffered from the flat surfaces. His batting is valuable at No. 8 where he has been key in strengthening the lower order. Injury ended his series a game early, but he should enjoy bowling during May inEngland.Sulieman Benn
Produced the best match return by a West Indies spinner since 1975when he took 8 for 108 in the first Test, playing an equally crucialpart to Taylor in the victory. He tied the England batsmen down in both innings, impressively holding his nerve in a duel with Pietersento claim him for 97. He didn’t pose the same threat from then on as England showed more intent against him, although it was a harsh callto drop him for the final Test. He is West Indies’ best spin optionfor a long term.5Lendl Simmons
Caught the attention early in the tour with his 282 for West Indies A,but had to wait until the final Test for his chance when he debuted onhis home ground. He was composed in his first innings, taking 24 ballsto open his account, and was promoted up to open in the second afterGayle’s injury. A promising future beckons.4Devon Smith
The problem that has plagued Smith’s stop-start career was evident throughout the series as he regularly threw away his starts and lived down to his average in the mid-20s. He has been given enough chances to show that he isn’t the long-term solution as a partner for Gayle and he will be nervously looking over his shoulder ahead of the tour to England.Daren Powell
It’s a sad indictment of the lack of other pace options around theCaribbean when the selectors persist with a man who averages over 47after 37 Tests. Powell struggled throughout the series and didn’toffer Gayle either penetration or control. In the final innings in Trinidad he wasn’t even used as England chased quick runs. To his credit he admitted hehad problems and was trying to work on them. He gains most of hismarks for his twin batting efforts in Antigua which proved crucial inthe series outcome.Ryan Hinds
Not good enough in either department but was persisted with for three matches. Seeing him as West Indies’ main spinner in the final Test was slightly depressing viewing. Still can’t translate his domestic batting form to the higher level although he played a responsible innings in the Trinidad rearguard before suffering an unfortunate dismissal. There aren’t a huge number of players pushing him for a place.Lionel Baker
An honest seamer, but nothing more than that at the moment. If he bulks out andstrengthens he could add a yard of pace and he will need that to become a genuine threat at the top level. Can probably look forward to somegreen wickets in England in May, though, to stake his claims further.1Xavier Marshall
One innings, a second-ball duck and no more chances, although thatisn’t as harsh as it sounds. He’d had a poor tour of New Zealand andwas on borrowed time. Needs plenty of domestic runs (or maybe some IPLpull-outs from the England tour) to earn his place back.